Categories
---------------------------------------------------------------
GOOD GAME., FAIR PLAY...JUST FOOTBALL
---------------------------------------------------------------

Tampilkan postingan dengan label economic. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label economic. Tampilkan semua postingan

Manchester United: New Sponsor of Shirt

⊆ 05.09 by Mo Hyo Se | ˜ 0 comments »


Aon Corp , the world's largest insurance broker, has agreed a four-year deal to sponsor the shirts of English Premier League champions Manchester United from the start of the 2010-11 season.

United's current 14 million pounds ($23.25 million) a year deal with U.S. insurance giant American International Group runs out in June 2010. Details of the agreement were not disclosed but U.S. media reports said it was worth about 20 million pounds a year. "We are delighted to be entering such an important relationship with a company of the stature of Aon and to have its logo adorn our shirts from the start of the 2010-11 season," United chief executive David Gill said in a statement. "We look forward to being closely aligned with the world leader in risk management, a firm which shares our values and is an exciting partner for Manchester United. "Today's announcement clearly strengthens our position as one of the biggest clubs in world football."

United won the Premier League title last month for the third year in a row to continue their domination of English football but they lost 2-0 to Barcelona in the Champions League final to end the season on a disappointing note. The deal represents a coup for Aon, which has secured one of the most prestigious advertising deals in sport with United's huge global fan base making them one of the top prizes in sports sponsorship. "It is a unique opportunity when two leaders in their respective fields can come together in a partnership such as the one we are announcing today," added Greg Case, president and chief executive officer of Aon. "Manchester United has one of the most recognised sports brands in the world. David and his team are all about winning and about excellence; the same holds true for the Aon team."

Aon last month posted a 28 percent rise in first-quarter net income but said softer insurance pricing and the economic downturn ate away at business. AIG told Reuters this year it would not renew its shirt sponsorship of United and that it had started cutting back costs in relation to the existing deal.

Once the world's biggest insurer by market value, AIG averted bankruptcy in September last year with an $85 billion federal bailout, which later swelled to about $152 billion. The company, which has sold assets and cut costs to repay part of the government rescue package, joins a string of other companies that have had to rein in spending on sport as the global economic downturn deepens.

United's appeal is enhanced by its growing legion of fans in the largely untapped Asian market. The club has exhibition games in China, Malaysia, South Korea and Indonesia planned for later this year. With the global financial crisis biting deeper by the day, companies around the world are cutting costs and slashing sponsorship budgets. Premier League club West Ham United went for weeks without shirt sponsorship after holiday firm XL went bust last year.

Formula One has also been hit. BMW-Sauber lost Swiss bank Credit Suisse as a sponsor this year and F1 teams agreed to reduce their budgets by 30 percent for 2009. Manchester United rely on sponsorship for about a third of their revenues. The club pays about 43 million pounds a year to service 660 million pounds in debt created when U.S. owner Malcolm Glazer bought the club in 2005.

(source: reuters)

 

Champions League: English Teams Dominated

⊆ 17.46 by Mo Hyo Se | ˜ 0 comments »


This week sees the second legs of the Champions League 1st Knock-out stage and the prize at stake is a place in the quarter-finals. It is doubtful that anyone will make much money betting that all four Premier League teams be in that last-eight draw. All four are in strong positions and have recent history on their side - a Premier league team has not been knocked out of the Champions League by a European team for nearly two years, since Milan beat Liverpool in the 2007 final! Last season the only teams that were able to eliminate Premier League teams, were other Premier League teams! Liverpool beat Arsenal in the quarter-finals, Chelsea then beat Liverpool in the semi-finals (at the third time of asking) and Manchester United then beat Chelsea on penalties following John Terry’s infamous slip.

Barca and Milan are the two teams that have been consistently able to beat English teams in the last few years, although they have also been on the losing end too. Milan beat Manchester United in the 1st knock-out round in 2005 and in the semi-finals in 2007, when they beat Liverpool in the final. However they have lost to both Liverpool (famously in 2005’s final) and Arsenal last season in the 1st knock-out round. Barca have beaten Chelsea in 2006’s 1st knock-out round and then Arsenal in that year’s final, but they have lost to Chelsea (2005), Liverpool (2007) and Manchester United (2008). Other teams to have knocked out Premier League clubs since 2004-5 are Bayern Munich (Arsenal, 2005), Benfica (Liverpool, 2006) and PSV (Arsenal, 2007). Chelsea deserve a special mention - since 2005 they have only been knocked-out by English teams (three times) and Barcelona.

Other statistics since 2005 - the four premier league clubs have 10 semi-final appearances between them, they have each appeared in at least one final, each final has featured at least one English team. There is a clear trend in this data - Premier League clubs are becoming more difficult to beat in Europe every year and this has prompted FIFA chief Sepp Blatter to voice his concern; “I have my concerns because the Premier League is the strongest in the world, definitely. It is taking over in such a manner that the other leagues have difficulties to match it.” He also noted that the Premier League itself was also dominated by the same teams that dominate the Champions League; “In a competition where two-thirds or three-quarters of the participants in the league play not to be first, but not to be relegated, there is something wrong.”

For once the Swiss is talking a bit of sense, but is in no position to be able to rectify the problem. Blatter has identified the foreign influence in English football as the root of the problem and said he would attempt to convince Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore to impose a minimum requirement for home-grown talent on the pitch in an attempt to prevent the pillaging of young talent from abroad and warned that domestic owners might provide better stewardship through the economic downturn. “I want to try to, if not persuade him (Richard Scudamore), then at least influence him in his thoughts that to have a minimum of local players will enhance the quality of his league. Foreign ownership is definitely a risk, it is not the basis of football, but here we can do nothing. At the moment in the economic crisis, maybe the big investors and the big companies, will have less money to go in than local or regional investors who will be there because they identify themselves with the club.”

The debate over foreign ownership has been ongoing for sometime in the Premier League and, with the exception of Randy Lerner’s tenure at Aston Villa, none of the foreign owners have exactly covered themselves in glory; the crass spending of Chelsea and Manchester City, the lack of spending and boardroom soap opera at Liverpool, the financial and managerial shenanigans at Portsmouth and West Ham and the quite terrifying level of debt incurred at Manchester United.

Blatter though has missed the point when he focuses on foreign owners and players. They are simply a symptom of the problem, which is, of course, money. Without the huge sums distributed to the English clubs initially through the sale of television rights, the clubs and the league itself would not be so high profile and attractive to foreign owners and players. The skillful marketing of the Premier League combined with the nature of the English game and the expectations of the fans have created a ravenous monster that seems unstoppable. FIFA and UEFA have been marketing football for years, monetizing their competitions (World Cup, European Championship and Champions League) via television rights, exclusive sponsorships and merchandising, now the Premier League have taken up that baton and ran with it so successfully suddenly things are looking a bit different. What are the chances of another all-English final, or even two all-English semi-finals?

(source: english-premier-league.org)

 

AIG - Manchester United: no renew contract

⊆ 23.40 by Mo Hyo Se | ˜ 0 comments »

AIG, the American insurance firm, has confirmed it will not renew its sponsorship deal with Manchester United, however the club remain confident of securing an improved deal elsewhere when their current contract ends in May 2010.

The company, which has suffered massive losses during the global economic downturn, says it remained in discussions over its current deal with the world and European champions, which is due to expire in May 2010.

Despite the news United say they have already opened discussions with a number of global companies, who they feel, could offer United an improvement on their current deal. Sahara, the Indian financial services corporation, has already confirmed United have made contact to gauge its interest in sponsoring the club, while Saudi Telecom have also been sounded out about replacing the AIG deal.

The Old Trafford club also have strong links in both Malaysia and South Korea, so even at a time of financial prudence around the world, United are still optimistic of bettering their current contract, worth £19million including various financial packages

"In line with industry practice, Manchester United is exploring the possibility of a shirt sponsor for the new 2010/11 season," a United spokesman said. "The club is in dialogue with a select number of top companies worldwide and has so far received sufficient interest to be confident it can improve on its current £19m annual partnership with AIG."

AIG came close to collapsing in the final few months of last year as it fell victim to the worst housing market since the Great Depression. The situation became so bad that the US government was forced to extend it a $150billion (£109.3 billion) loan, which it is unlikely to get back, which almost certainly saved AIG from oblivion.

AIG reached its perilous state after having to pay out tens of billions of dollars on insurance policies written on mortgages that homeowners cannot possibly repay. It will also make tens of billions of additional losses on complex investments tied to properties that are plummeting in value

(source: timesonline.co.uk)